With the proliferation of all types of information in the internet also comes the proliferation of problems and issues. Take for example, Wikipedia. For many, it is a great source of information on almost every kind of topic. But due to the anonymity of the contributors and the fact that everyone can be a contributor/editor to its contents, the reliability of its contents will be always questioned (what’s weird though is that I’ve read a particular case in SCRA wherein the ponencia used Wikipedia as reference to define a particular term, if I remember it right, it’s the case of Cagandahan, a transgender).
This scenario is not exclusive to Wikipedia. A lot of unreliable information is also being displayed on youtube and on different forums. I remember watching a talk show where one of the guests said she learned how to inject collagen implants into her lips from youtube. She followed the instructions of the so-called “expert” and of course, the result was disastrous. So I guess it’s up to the internet user to be wary of all the information he/she gets from the internet. In a way, this scenario is analogous to the term “caveat emptor” in the law of sales. In the world wide web, research is at your own risk. A good balance between being resourceful and being a skeptic should be struck. That way the internet will be a friend instead of a traitor.
(Twelfth entry)
Image from:
http://megl.deviantart.com/art/Laptop-girl-32676635
1 comment:
in IT, there is always a solution to your problem. sabi nga ni moi, if nagcrash hard drive mo, andyan pa rin yung data. sabi ba naman niya, how do you think those guys from FBI or CIA get the data from fried/burned pcs etc. makes sense. the thing is, hindi lang tayo familiar kung paano :)
Post a Comment