Class acts

Just a thought. A lot of students today use laptops / netbooks in class. Because of this "emerging trend", there's this new law school lingo that has recently emerged. When I first entered law school, there were at least 2 technology-related law school terms related to classes that I was supposed to be familiar with:

radyo (verb) - conveying the right answer (sometimes, it could be an educated guess or a wild guess) to your classmate, usually a seatmate, by means of mouthing, whispering or just saying the word while such classmate is reciting as a form of assistance, which may or may not anger the professor

-and-

tv (verb) - same as above, except it's conveyed by means of writing the answer on paper; one variation is typing the answer on a laptop screen and then enlarging the answer so that it can be seen several rows back

As technology advanced and as the UP College Law jumped onto the wi-fi bandwagon, so too have class recitations or class discussions evolved. Recently, I've been seeing a lot of comments on facebook about "livefeeds." I got the joke, and I agree that it's funny. As it turns out, there's now "livefeed" of classes via students surfing the net and communicating through social networks, specifically, facebook. I think, for incoming freshmen, it's not enough to familiarize them with radyo and tv. Livefeed must now be on the list.

Unlike radyo and tv, however, which sometimes do not anger, but instead, relieve professors who are getting impatient with the person reciting and hopeful of moving the discussion forward, "livefeed" is not something professors will ever appreciate. The problem with "livefeed" is that it's not so much that persons outside classrooms are tuned into what's going inside the classroom, and maybe even, learn from what's going on inside the classroom. Rather, it's the student that's actually tuned out and jeopardizing learning inside the classroom.

I do not claim to be holy. I use my netbook in classrooms as well, for the purpose of "multi-tasking".



Salma F. Angkaya
Entry #10

For educational purposes

“The simplest schoolboy is now familiar with truths for which Archimedes would have given his life.”

~ Ernest Renan (Souvenirs d'enfance et de jeunesse, 1883)

(Source: http://blog.calgarypubliclibrary.com/blogs/homework_help/archive/2009/02.aspx)

Philippine society places a premium on education. Most Filipino parents consider education as one of the most important legacies they can impart to their children, and are willing to make enormous sacrifices to send their children to school. Despite budget cuts (#$%@!!!), the Philippine government also extends certain privileges to the education sector and formulates policies that are intended to promote education. One example is the tax exemption for real property used by non-stock non-profit educational instutitions, actually, directly and exclusive "for education purposes." Another example (which I believe is the law usually alluded to by our professor in Law and ICT) is the exception carved out for education's sake in Philippine copyright law: FAIR USE.

And then there's the Book Publishing Industry Development Act (RA 8047 ), which allows "tax and duty-free importation of books or raw materials to be used in book publishing." RA 8047 provides that the Philippines’ national book policy is to reaffirm and ensure the country’s commitment to the UNESCO principle of free flow of information and other related provisions as embodied in the 1950 Florence Agreement on the Importation of Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials, to which the Philippines acceded in 1952. The treaty has provided for duty-free importation of books to guarantee the free flow of “educational, scientific, and cultural materials” between countries and declared that imported books should be duty-free.

But foreign books are still expensive!!!

And then came e-books.

I've actually tried buying a used paperback copy of a foreign book I'm interested in from Amazon, but apparently the seller doesn't deliver to countries other than the US. So I thought about buying an e-book.

But foreign e-books are still expensive!!! The cheapest foreign e-book is about $10. That's about a 120-page book. The price of e-books are proportional to the thickness and academic value of the book. I just can't afford the $150++ e-book I need.

It boggles me. We're supposedly in the information age, but as the law of economics goes, higher demand, higher prices (I got it right this time I hope). More than half a century since the Florence Agreement, and we're anywhere but near the idea of free flow of information. Sure, there are lots of available information on the internet. Thank God for SSRN, I could at least do some rough research work at home. But the really good information is on WESTLAW, LEXISNEXIS, JSTOR, etc. (no point linking here because the sites require passwords).

Now... Going back to FAIR USE. Section 185.1 of the Intellectual Property Code (RA 8293) states:

185.1. The fair use of a copyrighted work for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, research, and similar purposes is not an infringement of copyright x x x

So... out of desperation, taking 185.1 into consideration + the Florence agreement + my educational purpose, I decided to ... download. You get what I mean. And thank God for the international network of desperate AND generous scholars, I got the e-books I need. Now, my friends refer to me as the resident librarian. Hey, I'm just the simple schoolgirl.

... Or maybe, we're back to Archimedes' time, and I'm up for the big kill.

Salma F. Angkaya

Entry #5