The Paradox of Satellite Maps and Navigation Systems

Source: http://www.saynotocrack.com/index.php/2007/03/17/satellite-navigation-systems-are-always-right/

The Christchurch earthquake that killed many, amazingly, has been mapped from space. (Click here for the map) The map is able to show the focus of the tremor, compliments to Japanese Satellite technology. On a similar note, it was found out that some Royal Air Force (RAF) who made a daring Libyan rescue mission used a black-and-white hastily printed Google map in order to land to a suitable area to accept passengers and make a swift escape. And of course, the American Global Positioning System (GPS) makes it possible for drivers to tread unfamiliar roads, for controlling commercial aircraft and for tracking of cargo to the opening of train doors at stations.

All these, thanks to satellite technology.

But scientists are now sending out warnings about the dangerous over-reliance of humans on these satellite technologies, on top of the already teeming controversy and criticisms against them.

It is said that “Disruption could come from technological problems or from deliberate interference, by criminals using small-scale jammers to avoid road tolls or block the tracking of cargo, or terrorists seeking to attack entire systems”; and that “consequences ranging from the inconvenient--such as passenger information system failures--to possible loss of life--such as interruptions to emergency services communications.” (Click here for article)

Even prank-related problems abound. In the United Kingdom, Google Earth is said to have made possible the vandalism of private property, the most notorious of which is the graffiti of a penis being drawn on the roof of a house and even a school. A high school football field is also defaced when its grass was removed to create the image of a penis approximately 35 yards long and 20 yards wide. 

All these, thanks again to satellite technology.

Whatever the consequences and probable vulnerabilities of the technology, its usefulness and the convenience it generates is undeniable. Its weaknesses only call for a responsive and positive reception. Something can be done. Its use could be limited by States to disaster-response or educational, scientific and economic purposes. For instances calling for stricter measures, its applications can be simply blocked.

See, paranoia should not be fed. It should be dealt with.

- Phebean Belle A. Ramos, entry #16