To the bill's opponents, the issue is what does this mean for legitimate "fair use" of materials for purposes of criticism, comment, etc. There are numerous websites (warning: the videos in these sites are NSFW) which showcase videos by independent internet film critics--videos which make heavy use of video clips from the original, reviewed source material. The bill's opponent are fearful of the prior restraint on their right to express their opinions on films, as a result of the passage of the bill. They also decry that by making online streaming a felony, they are put at the mercy of the US Criminal Justice system, whose principal interest is not the determination of whether or not internet streaming may constitute fair use, but lies in putting offenders in jail, regardless of the soundness of the criminal statute.
To this blogger, the true test of the soundness of this bill is if it actually promotes the development of "sciences and useful arts" without abridging free speech as enshrined in the US Constitution. And that will only become evident after it is passed into law and we've all seen how it is applied. Until then, let's wait with bated breath. in the meantime, you can read the bill here for your own enrichment.
No comments:
Post a Comment